JombliGenerate policy
For K–12 school administrators

Board-ready AI policiesin under 15 minutes.

Answer 15 questions about your district and get a complete, defensible AI policy — with teacher guidelines, student guidelines, and classroom templates ready to take to your next board meeting.

Generate your policyFree during beta · No login required
  • FERPA-aligned
  • TEC §11.169
  • TEKS-aligned

Every generated policy is grounded in the frameworks that matter.

  • FERPA
  • COPPA
  • TEC §11.169
  • TEA AI Guidance
  • NIST AI RMF
  • TEKS
How it works

Answer questions, get a full policyin minutes, not weeks.

Structured intake, AI-generated draft, editable output. Nothing to learn — you just answer questions about your district.

  1. 01

    Answer 15 questions

    Grade bands, approved tools, assessment stance, discipline framework, parent-consent model.

  2. 02

    We generate the full policy

    Eleven policy sections plus teacher guidelines, student guidelines, and five ready-to-use templates.

  3. 03

    Review, export, adopt

    Edit what you want, download the policy, and take the draft to your board or counsel.

What you get

A full policy packet,not just a statement.

Staff and students get the same rules in language made for them.

Policy Sections

11 sections · Generated per district

  • 01Purpose
  • 02Scope
  • 03Student Use
  • 04Prohibited Uses
  • 05Teacher Responsibilities
  • 06Lesson Planning
  • 07Privacy
  • 08Transparency
  • 09Enforcement
  • 10Teacher Guidelines
  • 11Student Guidelines

Templates

5 classroom-ready templates

  • 01Parent notification letter
  • 02Classroom poster
  • 03Teacher quick-reference
  • 04Student disclosure form
  • 05Rubric addendum
Real output

What the policyactually looks like.

Real excerpts from a policy generated for a Texas K-12 district. Not mockups.

Policy Excerpt

Purpose · K–12 District

Jombli-generated excerpt for a hypothetical Texas district.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly present in K–12 instruction, and Lakeview Independent School District chooses to steward these tools with care. This policy follows the U.S. Department of Education's guiding principle that AI augments — rather than replaces — educator judgment. In practice, no automated grade or disciplinary decision will be issued without a human educator reviewing and approving it, ensuring that AI serves as a support rather than a substitute.

Policy Excerpt

Student Use · K–12 District

Jombli-generated excerpt for a hypothetical Texas district.

At the middle school level, AI is used under teacher supervision with explicit scaffolding to support structured planning and verification. Students may not use AI on quizzes, tests, or graded assessments unless the teacher has explicitly authorized AI for that specific task and described what part of the task AI may support.

Permitted uses:

  • Outline a persuasive essay in English/Language Arts using a teacher-provided template, then draft independently.
  • Summarize scientific articles in Science, verified against two class-approved sources.
  • Generate historical timelines in Social Studies, reviewed with a peer using the annotation checklist.
  • Develop math problem sets in Mathematics, checked against the assignment rubric before submission.

Policy Excerpt

Privacy · K–12 District

Jombli-generated excerpt for a hypothetical Texas district.

Any AI tool used with student data must operate under FERPA's "school official" exception — the vendor performs a function the school would otherwise perform itself, under the school's direct control, for a legitimate educational interest. Vendor agreements must prohibit use of student data to train foundation models outside the contracted educational purpose, prohibit sale of student data, and require deletion on contract termination. For vendors serving students under 13 (where COPPA applies), the vendor must provide the information required for the school to consent on parents' behalf per FTC guidance, and must practice data minimization. The district maintains a separate list of currently approved vendors; new tools are reviewed before classroom use.

Why we built this

Built for superintendentswho need a defensible answer — now.

Most districts are writing AI policy in the middle of the school year, with no internal specialist and no realistic timeline to draft from scratch. Jombli exists to close that gap. Every generated policy is grounded in the frameworks that actually govern your decisions — FERPA, COPPA, TEC §11.169, TEA guidance, NIST AI RMF, and TEKS.

Why now

Texas districts must adoptan AI policy this year.

Three pressures converging, and no one on staff owns it.

01

Texas requires it

TEC §11.169 requires Texas districts to adopt a policy governing student use of AI and AI-generated material. The statute sets the floor; your district chooses how strict.

02

FERPA still applies

Any AI tool that touches student names, grades, IEPs, or behavior records falls under FERPA. A usable AI policy has to name the rules for what teachers can and can't put into a prompt.

03

No one on staff owns this

Most districts don't have an internal AI policy specialist. The work is landing on superintendents, curriculum directors, and IT leads who already have full jobs.

Ready to take a policy to your board?

Generate a complete draft in under 15 minutes. Free during beta.